Law Vertical
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
  • News
  • Crime
  • Business law
  • Columns
    • People’s corner
    • Academic corner
  • Law TV
  • Home
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
  • News
  • Crime
  • Business law
  • Columns
    • People’s corner
    • Academic corner
  • Law TV
No Result
View All Result
Law Vertical
No Result
View All Result
Home Supreme Court

Menstrual Hygiene part of Right to life: Supreme Court

Lays down measures for Menstrual Hygiene Management in schools

Lawvertical News Service by Lawvertical News Service
January 30, 2026
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0
Supreme Court judges ruling on Menstrual Hygiene Management in schools.

In an order that would go a long way to ensuring Menstrual Hygiene Management (MHM) in schools, the Supreme Court on Friday ruled that right to menstrual health is an integral part of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.

RELATED POSTS

Delhi High Court orders taking down of “false and misleading” reports of CJI, Ministers attending Badminton event in London

Left Govt’s big U-turn on Sabarimala Women entry ; tells SC “wide consultation” needed

NCERT book row: Supreme Court outraged; bans Class-8 book with section on ‘corruption in the judiciary’

A bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan linked it to the right to live with dignity.

“We say so because dignity cannot be reduced to an abstract ideal, it must find expression in conditions that enable individuals to live without humiliation, exclusion, or avoidable suffering. For menstruating girl children, the inaccessibility of MHM measures subjects them to stigma, stereotyping, and humiliation,” the bench said.

The court said that “the right to education loses its spirit if such conditions exist that exclude menstruating girl children from the educational process” and “addressing the impediments through affirmative actions would be consistent with the substantive approach to equality embodied in Article 14 of the Constitution.”

The judgement pointed out that a 2024 research paper on “school absenteeism during menstruation amongst adolescent school girls in North India…found that nearly one-third of girls were absent from school due to issues related to menstrual health, restrictive societal norms, and inadequate menstrual hygiene management. Out of approximately 500 students, 29.2% of the participants were reported to be absent from school during menstruation…Notably, girls using hygienic methods reported lower absenteeism as compared to others.”

The court said that lack of MHM measures at school not just disrupts a girl child’s presence in school, but “impairs her access to opportunities both during schooling and later in life” and “lead to recurrent absenteeism which would result in gap in learning” which “over the period of time…would translate into lower academic performance, and reduced participation in classroom…” and ultimately, their “dropping out.”

The judgement noted that the consequences of not providing barrier free access which would include “absence of sanitary napkins and a hygienic mechanism to dispose” as prescribed by the Right to Education Act, would entail even de-recognition of schools.

 

The bench also issued a slew of directions to ensure that Menstrual Hygiene Management (MHM) HM measures are put in place.

  1.     All States and Union Territories shall ensure that every school, whether Government-run or privately managed, in both urban and rural areas, is provided with the functional, gender-segregated toilets with usable water connectivity.
  2.     All the existing and newly constructed toilets in schools ensure privacy and accessibility, including by catering to the needs of children with disabilities.
  3.     All school toilets shall be equipped with functional hand-washing facilities, with soap and water available at all times.
  4.     All States and Union Territories shall ensure that every school, whether Government-run or privately managed, in both urban and rural areas, provides oxo-biodegradable sanitary napkins manufactured in compliance with the ASTM D-6954 standards free of cost. Such sanitary napkins shall be made readily accessible to girl students, preferably within the toilet premises through sanitary napkin vending machines, or, where such installation is not immediately feasible, at a designated place or with a designated authority within the school.
  5.     All States and Union Territories shall ensure that every school, whether Government-run or privately managed, in both urban and rural areas, establish Menstrual Hygiene Management (MHM) corners. Such MHM corners shall be equipped with, including but not limited to, spare innerwear, spare uniforms, disposable bags, and other necessary materials to address menstruation-related exigencies.
  6.     All States and Union Territories shall ensure that every school, whether Government-run or privately managed, in both urban and rural areas, is equipped with a safe, hygienic, and environmentally compliant mechanism for the disposal of sanitary napkins, in accordance with the latest Solid Waste Management Rules.
  7.     Each toilet unit shall be equipped with a covered waste bin for the collection of sanitary material, and cleanliness and regular maintenance of such bins shall be ensured at all times.
  8.     The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) and the State Council of Educational Research and Training (SCERT) shall incorporate gender-responsive curricula, more particularly, on menstruation, puberty, and other related health concerns (PCOS, PCOD, etc.), with a view to break stigma and taboo associated with menstrual health and hygiene.
  9.     All teachers, whether male or female, shall be adequately trained and sensitized on menstrual hygiene, including appropriate ways of supporting and assisting menstruating students.
  10. Information regarding the availability of Jan Aushadhi Suvidha Oxo-Biodegradable Sanitary Napkin shall be widely disseminated through advertisement in social media, print media, radio advertisement, TV advertisement, cinema advertisement, and outdoor publicity like bus queue shelter branding, bus branding, auto wrapping, wall paintings.
  11. The child helpline set up by the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights in furtherance of Rule 26 of the RTE Rules be disseminated forthwith through social media, print media, radio advertisement, TV advertisement, cinema advertisement, etc.

 

Other directions:

  1.     District Education Officer (DEO) to conduct periodic inspections, preferably once in a year, of school infrastructure, particularly with regard to toilet and washing facilities, availability of menstrual absorbents, sanitary waste disposal mechanisms and training/awareness measures undertaken by the concerned school.
  2.     National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), or, as the case may be, the State Commission for Protection of Child Rights (SCPCR), to oversee the implementation of the aforesaid directions.

3.     Union of India and all the States and Union Territories to ensure that the directions are strictly complied with within a period of three months from the date of the pronouncement of the judgment.

Tags: Article 21Legal NewsMenstrual HealthMenstrual HygieneRight to EducationRight to lifeRTE ActSupreme Court
ShareTweet
Lawvertical News Service

Lawvertical News Service

Related Posts

Setback for Telegram; Delhi High Court upholds temporary ban ahead of NEET-UG 2026
High Courts

Delhi High Court orders taking down of “false and misleading” reports of CJI, Ministers attending Badminton event in London

June 20, 2026
Sabarimala women entry
News

Left Govt’s big U-turn on Sabarimala Women entry ; tells SC “wide consultation” needed

March 14, 2026
NCERT book row
News

NCERT book row: Supreme Court outraged; bans Class-8 book with section on ‘corruption in the judiciary’

February 26, 2026
Supreme Court of India bans NCERT class-8 book
News

Facing Supreme Court criticism over section on ‘corruption in the judiciary’, NCERT puts class-8 book on hold

February 26, 2026
Couple attempting Suicide
Supreme Court

Couple attempting Suicide: Survivor would be guilty of abeting the other’s suicide, Says Supreme Court

February 18, 2026
Thiruparankundram hills
Supreme Court

SC upholds Madras High Court decision banning animal sacrifice on holy Thiruparankundram hills

February 9, 2026

Recommended Stories

Supreme Court ITAT Appointment

SC criticises RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra over ITAT Member selection

January 31, 2026
Couple attempting Suicide

Couple attempting Suicide: Survivor would be guilty of abeting the other’s suicide, Says Supreme Court

February 18, 2026
UGC Regulations 2026 legal challenge.

Supreme Court to hear PIL challenging UGC’s “draconian” definition of “caste-based discrimination”.

January 29, 2026
Govt’s big strike on illegal religious conversions; new FCRA Rules bar registration for proselytisation
News

Govt’s big strike on illegal religious conversions; new FCRA Rules bar registration for proselytisation

June 23, 2026
Setback for Telegram; Delhi High Court upholds temporary ban ahead of NEET-UG 2026
High Courts

Delhi High Court orders taking down of “false and misleading” reports of CJI, Ministers attending Badminton event in London

June 20, 2026
Setback for Telegram; Delhi High Court upholds temporary ban ahead of NEET-UG 2026
High Courts

Setback for Telegram; Delhi High Court upholds temporary ban ahead of NEET-UG 2026

June 19, 2026
Thirumandhamkunnu Devi Temple
Kerala High Court

Thirumandhamkunnu temple: Setback for Malabar Devaswom Board as Kerala High Court says only hereditary trustees can appoint Executive Officer

June 2, 2026
Bhojshala: High Court says continuity of Hindu worship never extinguished
News

Bhojshala: High Court says continuity of Hindu worship never extinguished

May 15, 2026
Bhojshala complex is Saraswati temple: Madhya Pradesh High Court
High Courts

Bhojshala complex is Saraswati temple: Madhya Pradesh High Court

May 15, 2026

Popular Stories

  • US Supreme Court busts Trump's tariff threats

    US Supreme Court says Trump’s tariffs illegal; shot in the arm for India, world

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Explained: How Trump’s tariff war reached the US Supreme Court

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • NCERT book row: Supreme Court outraged; bans Class-8 book with section on ‘corruption in the judiciary’

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • High Court Division Bench clears release of movie ‘Kerala Story 2’

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Couple attempting Suicide: Survivor would be guilty of abeting the other’s suicide, Says Supreme Court

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Latest Legal News from Indian Courts: Key Judgments, Legal Developments & Expert Analysis

Law Vertical

Recent Posts

  • Govt’s big strike on illegal religious conversions; new FCRA Rules bar registration for proselytisation
  • Delhi High Court orders taking down of “false and misleading” reports of CJI, Ministers attending Badminton event in London
  • Setback for Telegram; Delhi High Court upholds temporary ban ahead of NEET-UG 2026

Categories

  • High Courts
  • Kerala High Court
  • News
  • Supreme Court

Find the Legal News from Indian Courts: Key Judgments, Legal Developments & Expert Analysis

No Result
View All Result

© LawVertical . All Rights Reserved. | Powered by Merivox

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
  • News
  • Crime
  • Business law
  • Columns
    • People’s corner
    • Academic corner
  • Law TV

© LawVertical . All Rights Reserved. | Powered by Merivox

Go to mobile version